Claude worked hard tonight, and the result is here. It’s an overview of templating and framework ideas, their pros and cons, and what Blaze could try to integrate maybe ?
2 Likes
Your brain is turning into mush. STOP IT!
Don’t give me free time and tokens 
After some serious thought, I started an experimental re-write here… https://github.com/wreiske/blaze-ng
Goal is to be a Full, modern TypeScript rewrite of Meteor Blaze with 100% API parity, all 370+ original tests passing, superior performance, and minimal dependencies. Drop-in replacement for any Meteor app.
You can check out the plan and progress here: blaze-ng/PLAN.md at main · wreiske/blaze-ng · GitHub
I’ll report back when it’s further along and ready to test.
Woh @wreiske nice work!
A couple of thoughts from the Blaze modernization work I’ve been doing on the main repo (if it can help you) :
Use native <template> elements : Since you’re targeting ES2020+ and already dropped IE11 ( 
), you could leverage document.createElement('template') in your materializer (Phase 3e). The .content property gives you a DocumentFragment directly, content inside doesn’t get parsed/executed (no rogue <img> loads or <script> execution), and template.content.cloneNode(true) is really fast for repeated rendering, which would pair well with {{#each}} over large lists. It’s cleaner than parseHTML(html) → DocumentFragment and aligns with your performance goals 
Edge case from the jQuery removal : One gotcha I hit during PR #489: focus and blur events don’t bubble. jQuery silently aliases them to focusin/focusout for event delegation. Since you’re using native addEventListener in your event system (Phase 3g), you’ll want to handle that explicitly or your delegated focus/blur handlers won’t fire 
And one thing though : full TypeScript might be overkill for a Blaze rewrite. The original codebase is plain JS and most Blaze users aren’t TypeScript shops. You could get the same benefits (typed APIs, IDE autocompletion) with JSDoc type annotations + a .d.ts file, without forcing contributors to write TypeScript. Just a thought 
4 Likes
So far pretty promising! The compilation takes a little longer, but the actual in-browser performance of running is better. Also SSR is working!!
https://blaze-ng.pages.dev/guide/performance.html#old-vs-new-head-to-head-comparison
@wreiske as long as this is non breaking for users we should consider this one for 3.1 as well. Against which branch did you compare the improvement?
1 Like
This will need a serious comb over and testing from the wider community before I would say it’s ready to be a “drop in replacement.” I had it run off main so probably missing any improvements that are living in branches 
That is the goal of course, but with literally 0 lines of code touched by humans and 100% re-write by Claud Opus 4.6… I wouldn’t trust it without a code walkthrough. I have been fixing little things as I notice them and it seems to pass all the original tests / API, so it might be good. I’m going to test it out in one of my production apps and see who squawks 
.
I’m also going to test out @blaze-ng/wasm | Blaze-NG which should provide even more performance improvements for sequence diffing and HTML tokenization.
Off-topic and unrelated to Blaze: I also notice that AI really, really likes to run npx meteor@latest run and it also put it in the documentation everywhere.
Meteor might consider making that work. I use npx all the time for other tools like wrangler, vite, etc…
2 Likes
Same for @wreiske :
As a user of Claude Code you should take a look into this package (actually the whole ecosystem):
“Greenhouse closes the last manual loop in the os-eco toolchain. It polls GitHub for pre-triaged issues, creates seeds tasks, dispatches overstory runs, and opens PRs when agents finish. The only human touchpoint is merging the PR.”
I’m using it extensively since a month and man, the speed of progress is huge.
Also watch this video which explains how we can manage open source packages way more effective and have a minimum of human intervention. This would speed up the work:
1 Like
Absolutely agree with that PoV
2 Likes