Topic for show #1:
(couldnāt resist ā¦ this just never gets old )
Topic for show #1:
(couldnāt resist ā¦ this just never gets old )
Now in all seriousness - just sort this forum by āViewsā; The future of Blaze is pretty much the most talked about topic within the top 20 posts. So something like:
Great initiative. Maybe half an hour would be better (Does there happen enough here to fill an hour long talk each week without repeating things to much?)
Anyway, that one hour will probably save me countless other hours reading and discussing here.
Itād be great if every now and then it could be live and thereās some time for live Q&A.
Iād love to hear more about this Data Team, and MDGās initial thoughts on where theyāll improve Meteor This might get really important for people who feel limited by the current data-layer!
Yes, an hour is long. I hope it is between 30 and 45 minutes.
We opted for a pre-recorded show so we would have the opportunity to prepare more and have the ability to pull in guests if possible. But a few live shows should happen too
Iād rather focus on recent threads than digging up the blaze thread again - there has been enough interesting stuff in the last week to make a whole show about, and I feel like it will be more interesting to keep it current.
Topics I would like to see discussed aside from what was already posted:
Iāll start the name game with āOK:GOā (see what I did there ?)
I understand the interest but thatās not about meteor. In fact, it contributes to so much of the distraction. Considering the coming of 1.3, There are so many meteor specific issues to address. Iām just saying.
That was just my bad attempt at Meteor forum humour. For some reason I find it funny but then again my sense of humour has been skewed by years of Seinfeld re-runs ā¦
How about speak in general about the true state of Meteorās Open Source(ness). And specifically why this PR has not been accepted.
Meteor current has 107 open pull requests and counting.
Heading to work soon and Iāll post about which threads Iād personally like to respond to. However, Iām not sure how we are going to select from all of these great suggestions.
Here are the top 10 posts of last month, according to Discourse:
I tried just last week, but there wasnāt as much good stuff compared to some of these. Here are the ones Iām most interested in talking about:
I think the plan is for me to select 3 and then weāll select 3 from community suggestions?
Wait, how is this list above sorted (Replies/Views seem out of order)? Since itās a weekly thing, why not most popular by week instead of month? Also, is this a live streaming thing or will it be recorded? Will you have a hotline we can call into if youāre taking on-air questions or will there be a side feed? Lastly, when will it drop?
I decided to look at the most popular ones last month since this is the first episode, and there are some great threads that donāt quite fall inside the boundary of one week.
Itās sorted by Discourseās perception of ātopā, which seems to include views, replies, and perhaps some other metrics.
When I was talking to Ben, we agreed that it would be interesting to have 3 topics selected by me personally, and 3 selected by some community process. The ones above are the ones Iām personally interested in, so there should be 3 more that are selected in a different way over which I have no control.
@benstr can you clarify the process for selecting these threads so that people can be aware?
Yep, @sashko is on target. We are having Sashko pick 3 he finds interesting and 3 from the community. I did not mention the part about Sashko picking 3 in the original post becauseā¦ I forgot sorry.
With Sashko having the ability to select his own topics gives the audience the opportunity to hear what he (MDG) is interested in and gives MDG the ability to share pertinent and timely information and/or announcements.
Sashko those are great topics