Came across a Reddit post via ElectronJS where someone wants to use Quasar, VueJS and ElectronJS.
As I’ve never heard about Quasar before I checked it out and besides the similarities in name usage (s an extremely luminous active galactic nucleus (AGN)) it looks pretty similar to what Meteor can do (minus the MongoDb tight integration).
Used Quasar for 1.5 year. It is incomparible to Meteor.
Quasar is a frontend “framework” with a build tool using Vue and Materialize. That’s all, and it’s awesome. Kind of similar to Next or Nuxt.
Meteor is a full-stack framework.
If you only want to build a frontend, you can use Quasar. If you want to build an complete application, use Meteor
The top-level app structure does not conform to the Meteor guide app structure
Nor does it conforms to the folder structure of the example in the Meteor-Vue guide Vue | Meteor Guide (which BTW also does not conform to the Meteor guide app structure to add to the confusion)
Nor does the folder structure below template/imports/ui to the folder structure below /src in the Quasar app structure guide App Structure - Quasar Framework
It also does not seem to correspond to any of the three Quasar flavors mentioned in the Quasar doc.
Is the motivation for all those mismatches explained somewhere? I guess it is in part due to Quasar being based on Webpack while Meteor is not, but knowing this does not really help understanding why the code of a Quasar-Vue-Meteor app is decomposed in different folder structures in all the available guides and kits.
" 1. Nor does the folder structure below template/imports/ui to the folder structure below /src in the Quasar app structure guide App Structure - Quasar Framework "